<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Student lead solutions&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techleader.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/student-lead-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techleader.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/student-lead-solutions/</link>
	<description>What matters most is not what the technology is, but what technology does in support of learning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeacherJay</title>
		<link>http://techleader.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/student-lead-solutions/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherJay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techleader.wordpress.com/2007/06/26/student-lead-solutions/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>At first, I had the familiar argument &quot;How do we know that comments will be genuine, accurate, and helpful?&quot;, but I think the success of sites like Wikipedia have shown that there is a responsible online community.  The next question though it can we be sure that our students will treat this responsibly and know how to use it for collaborative, feedback and not to write a paper for them or take it from somewhere else - in other words will they use it as a tool or an a resource?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first, I had the familiar argument &#8220;How do we know that comments will be genuine, accurate, and helpful?&#8221;, but I think the success of sites like Wikipedia have shown that there is a responsible online community.  The next question though it can we be sure that our students will treat this responsibly and know how to use it for collaborative, feedback and not to write a paper for them or take it from somewhere else &#8211; in other words will they use it as a tool or an a resource?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
